In a thread on Peach Pundit, state Rep. Earl Ehrhart responded (though not directly to me) to concerns I have about the GlennTax currently being discussed for next session. Namely, that it’s an attempt to consolidate power in the House. Here’s what he said:

If he wanted the power you are describing there would be no satutory guarantee in the proposed bill to pass all the money currently raised by locals plus some back to them.

Could it be changed? Of course, but taxes could be levied at a 100 % level also.

Neither are likely and neither are good policy.

Later in the same comment he says the local control argument is just a scare tactic:

Truly the home rule argument is just a scare tactic to divert the issue from finally getting rid of a rotten tax like property tax.

After he just finished acknowledging it’s possible the Legislature could decide later to take some graft off the top of the sales tax.

That it’s even possible that all money wouldn’t be passed back to locals is enough evidence to me that this proposal should not be considered seriously…unless you like your unintentional comedy in the form of a state government collapsing from the weight of corruption and heated strife with local governments. That’s the only level this dog of an idea is tempting on.