July 31, 2006
I work in the Colony Square building on 14th Street, and there’s a bomb threat next door at The Proscenium. Radio reports say the police believe it’s real, though I don’t think that’s confirmed yet. Here are photos from the scene taken from my office window:


As much as I’d like to sit around and play journalist with updates every ten minutes, I’m getting my ass out of here for a few hours.
July 30, 2006
This college football season has one of the more compelling opening slates in recent memory. Cal-Tennessee, Arkansas-USC and Georgia Tech-Notre Dame are all on tap for Sept. 2; we’ll see if former Tennessee quarterback Brent Schaeffer will actually show up to play for Ole Miss against Memphis Sept. 3, and then we’ll watch the annual Miami-FSU penalty-fest on Sept. 4.
Gamblers will probably want to avoid this Cal-Tennessee, as there are just too many question marks:
- Will Tennessee’s offense rebound from last year’s ranked-about-100-of-119 performance?
- Does Erik Ainge have his head on straight?
- Will a new offensive line give him time to throw even if he does?
- Will the receiving corps underachieve again?
- Will a old/new offensive coordinator make a difference in the team’s attitude and performance?
- How is the team’s confidence after last year’s 5-6 record?
- Doesn’t Tennessee always play better when people write them off, and terribly when they’re predicted to do well?
- How will Cal’s offense play with its quarterback suspended for the opener?
- How will Cal react to playing in an SEC stadium with 100,000 fans who are actually watching the game?
Those go along with traditional questions about opening day sloppiness, jitters, off-season conditioning, and mental preparedness. And there are other unpredictable variables that come into play with teams that have rarely, if ever, played each other. The teams are about evenly-stocked with talent (aren’t most teams now?), but we know that rarely translates to wins and losses.
USC-Arkansas is mostly compelling to see what USC’s offense will look like without Heisman winners Reggie Bush and Matt Leinhart. Closer-but-not-close than last year’s USC blowout seems to be the consensus, but it’s opening day so anything can happen. And Arkansas did smack Texas around a couple of years ago.
As a Tennessee fan I should probably thank Notre Dame for taking Jimmy Clausen off my school’s hands, but it should be obvious I’d like Georgia Tech to beat the Irish given some of my past rants. That outcome is doubtful but not impossible given the Yellow Jackets’ habit of playing surprisingly well against highly-ranked opponents and surprisingly poorly against everyone else.
But what about Georgia fans? You’ve got yourself a conundrum. Check this Dawg Sports preview for background, come back and let me know what you think. The whole thing is worth a read, but I found this comparison especially interesting:
Notre Dame is a self-righteous condescending scourge awash in sanctimoniousness and bathed in media adulation. Georgia Tech is merely an annoyance, not unlike the insect with which the North Avenue Trade School’s mascot shares its name. A rigid and reflexive “Dawg Fan = Always Roots Against Tech” policy seems to me to give the Yellow Jackets pride of place out of all proportion to their actual significance, not at all unlike a strict “Vol Fan = Always Roots Against Vandy” stance.
Sound like hyperbole? Writer tkyleking points out that in the past 15 meetings, Tennessee is 14-1 against Vandy while Georgia is 12-3 against Georgia Tech.
I could take or leave Notre Dame. I think of the school as being an inoffensive second-tier program (the way Tennessee and, yes, Georgia are second tier programs compared to USC, Miami, and Oklahoma in recent years.. consistently top 25, but not in national title contention when bowl time rolls around). Jmac’s analysis is spot-on regarding the Irish:
[I]f we take a look at some of the existing data, we find that much of Notre Dame’s success came largely in the 1920s and the 1940s. It’s remarkable success, to be sure, but those numbers tend to artificially inflate their overall rankings. Notre Dame captured four national titles in the 1940s, losing only nine games in the entire decade.
However, upon looking at the 1950s and 1960s, we see a return to earth for the Irish. It was still an impressive 126-65-8, but it doesn’t compare to the gaudy 155-50-4 record Oklahoma put up and, all things considered, it isn’t that much better than Georgia’s 110-87-13 mark over the same 20-year span.
It seems to me the Irish were the program from 1920 through 1949, however they have done little to distinguish themselves since then. A title pops up here and there, but Notre Dame has done little — in comparison with the other members of the ‘Big Eight’ as well as upstart competitors like Miami and Florida State — to stake a longterm claim to its supposed throne.
You should read his post to get context about who his top 8 programs are. He makes a good case that Michigan is the best overall program, though I won’t say I agree with him without reviewing records on my own.
Predictions? Thoughts? Grievances?
« Hide it
July 28, 2006
A few months ago, I had the idea (that I thought was original at the time) to create a product where users could add audio comments to posts, then listen to the audio sequentially — sort of a podcast created in bits and pieces at varying times and locations.
Then Skype added a feature to its software that let up to 100 users speak on a conference call at once (which in turn isn’t hard to record and post somewhere). That happened before I even had time to look up a venture capitalist’s phone number.
Well, now it appears video sharing site Grouper has upped the ante, adding a feature to its site where users can add video comments through a web cam. The videos and video commenting software all work through Flash, and can be embedded on a web site the same way YouTube videos are.
All I can say is… wow! View an example of the technology in action here. It’s similar to what I wanted to make, except mine was going to be audio-only.
If this catches on, it could dethrone YouTube. What I know for certain is this is the first application I’ve ever seen that actually made me want to buy a web cam.
h/t Techcrunch
Cross-posted on my Georgia Podcast Network blog
July 26, 2006
Be sure to place your votes in Creative Loafing’s Best of Atlanta contest. The deadline is tomorrow, so there’s no time to waste! Please vote for the Georgia Podcast Network for best local web site, and one of our programs for best local podcast. We’re partial to Mostly ITP, but they’re all fine choices.
h/t Atlanta Metroblog
Here’s another reason to dust out the bomb shelter:
As we get close to the final availability of Internet Explorer 7, I want to provide an update on our distribution plans. To help our customers become more secure and up-to-date, we will distribute IE7 as a high-priority update via Automatic Updates (AU) shortly after the final version is released for Windows XP, planned for the fourth quarter of this year.
So… they’re just going to compel people to upgrade without any regard for whether Internet Explorer 7 is:
- Compatible with custom corporate applications, and
- Compatible with most sites on the web in general.
That’s spectacular. The bright side is this probably ensures job security for another five years or so.
July 25, 2006
Hello there blogosphere, so nice to see you. I know we haven’t spoken in a while… that you’ve missed my delusions of grandeur, and me your sweet vapid beckonings and promises of further insulating the already insular. Here’s what’s been going on lately:
- Movie review podcast on the Georgia Podcast Network! It’s on now that we’ve figured out how to incorporate sound effects on the fly. Look for more reviews in the future.
- I’m writing a program to collect NCAA Picks information this year. The back end is almost finished. It’s going to kick ass. More info to follow…
July 21, 2006
The 6th district is inexplicably represented by a medical doctor, Tom Price, who not only voted against investing money in stem cell research in 2005, but did so again in 2006–and refused to vote to overturn the recent Bush veto, as if to put an exclamation mark on his “no.” Further, he’s voting against the district’s interest by voting to extend the Bush tax cuts, in the current frantic-spending environment being propelled by Republicans–thereby embodying the Republican version of “cut and run,” which is to cut taxes and run away from the resulting debt.
This is the district formerly represtented by Newt Gingrich, so it’ll be a tough sell. But the Democrats have an intriguing candidate for this seat which Price won unopposed in the last election–and Steve Sinton has a grasp of the issues and a conservative, yet progressive, position to provide an appealing alternative to the status quo. He’s been making quite an impression. I like the way he puts his stem cell position:
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Recently, President Bush–against the will of the majority of Americans–vetoed a bill supporting embryonic stem cell research. Our health is being held hostage.
Instead of finding cures to cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and other diseases that afflict many of us and our loved ones, a stroke of a pen – W’s first veto – made him The Decider. We don’t get the best medical breakthrough of the century. What’s worse is that my opponent, a medical doctor, REFUSED to vote to override President Bush’s veto.
Isn’t it time we send a message to Washington, not a rubber stamp?
Please, please, please stop referring to Casey Cagle as a moderate. Just because Ralph Reed was a sociopathic pseudo-religious type who adopted the word “conservative” doesn’t mean that anyone other than him involved in the same race must be a moderate or liberal. Cagle’s record is conservative to the point of being anti-consumer which makes libertarians cheer, liberals bristle, and people like me a little wary of him but relieved he’s not Ralph Reed just the same.
And I have yet to see analysis of the election results that I thought hit the mark. These results are too strange to be explained by any single factor, as most people (including me) have tried to do. Here are just a few dynamics in play:
- Crossover votes in the 4th against Cynthia McKinney
- Crossover votes statewide against Ralph Reed
- Extraordinarily low turnout, in part because of:
- Disaffected Democrats because of the brutality in the governor’s (and later) the lt. governor’s race
- Disaffected Republicans because of the brutality of the lt. governor’s race
- Disaffected gays because of Cathy Cox’s flip-flopping
- Disaffected evangelicals because of the scumbaggery of Reed
- Cynicism about the electoral process in general: Exasperation with Republicans for running nearly everything into the ground and with Democrats for not offering any real alternative
Until I see something really convincing, my thought is that anyone who claims to have a full explanation for the results is full of shit. It’s nearly impossible to quantify crossover votes in any substantive way, and even more difficult to prove a negative (i.e. - who stayed home, and of those who didn’t, who crossed over).
Some people have claimed this is the beginning of a categorical rejection evangelical Christians’ electoral clout. Others still have claimed this only reflects evangelicals’ resolved willingness to reject their own when they feel betrayed. Either is possible, as are other scenarios, like Democratic turnout being higher simply because national Republicans are screwing the pooch that badly. But it’s all conjecture, so don’t take it too seriously. There are a lot of people who are filling a logic vacuum with wishful thinking.
July 20, 2006
A quote from my interview with pastor Billy Ball at the Atlanta Pride Festival was featured in an article in AfterElton.
Rusty Tanton, a Mostly ITP show host with the Georgia Podcast Network, interviewed Ball during the Atlanta Pride festival.
“We’re out here preaching the gospel and warning the sodomites that are part of this gathering that if they don’t repent they are going to hell,” Ball told Tanton. “We have an objection to [homosexuality] because God has an exception to it. It’s an abomination in the sight of God. It’s the most accepted tolerated sin in America right now, I think, besides abortion, and the church is way too quiet about it.
“We came out here because we love these people enough to warn them and rebuke them, Ball added. “The word of God clearly spells out that sodomy, man with man, woman with woman, is an abomination before God.”
Check it out here.
Cross-posted on my Georgia Podcast Network blog.
July 19, 2006
Major surprises to me about last night’s results:
- Casey Cagle’s 12 percent margin of victory over Ralph Reed in the GOP LG race
- What happened to Shyam Reddy and Scott Holcomb in the Dem SOS race? I guess Gail Buckner wasn’t kidding about her polling. I’d just like to know where all that support came from.
- Ray McBerry, who was supposed to be token opposition, pulling almost 12 percent of the vote against Sonny Perdue in the GOP Gov. race
- Mac McCarley’s abysmal showing in the Dem Gov. race (just over 2 percent). So much for gay protest votes.
- Cindy Sheehan showing up to get jiggy with Cynthia McKinney in the 6th. Maybe Hugo Chavez forgot to RSVP?
I want to write about all these scenarios in detail and throw some numbers around, but I don’t have time now. Please chat it up in the comments. I’m especially intrigued by McBerry and Cagle’s surprisingly strong showings contrasted with McCarley’s awful one. I suspect more crossover voting than was predicted by most people, but don’t have time to crunch numbers to validate that theory one way or the other.
UPDATE: Of course, that theory could be (and I think probably is) totally misguided since with 98.6 percent of precincts reporting, 53,451 more people voted in the Dem. Governor’s primary (466,262) than in the GOP Governor’s primary (412,811). That makes these results even stranger to me.