For (apparently) putting the kibosh on the concealed weapons in restaurants bill (HB193). From yesterday’s Political Insider (login).

No explanation was given, but we can hazard a guess. With the exception of a very few bills intended for the Republican base, this session’s low-volume agenda has been devoted to: A) reinforcing GOP ties with a business community that will be funding the ‘06 contests; or B) convincing suburban women — now a key swing vote in Georgia — that they need not fear the excesses of GOP rule.

Apparently, the concealed weapon issue didn’t go over well with either “A” or “B.” Restaurateurs had nightmares over liability issues that come when 9mm semi-automatics mix with surly waiters and dirty spoons.

And women somehow found no comfort in the possibility that the gentleman in the next booth at Applebee’s could offer cover fire in a pinch.

Also referenced in PI, check HB539, which would give the film industry tax credits for shooting in Georgia. The theory is a film crew is attracted to the state by incentives, stays a few months, generates enough sales tax revenue to more than make up for the initial incentive, then leaves. PI dubs them “super tourists.”

Finally, there was Democratic Lt. Governor candidate Greg Hecht’s letter to Christian Coalition leader Sadie Fields.

Dear Sadie,

I hope you are doing well. I appreciate the invitation to the event this Saturday. Unfortunately, I have a conflict, but I am grateful for your hard work. You have been dedicated to families for a long time, and I appreciate your service. While we agree on some issues and disagree on some other issues, I have always been appreciative of your concern for all people. Also, I thought the paper took an unfair shot at you last year. Take care.

Greg K. Hecht.

That pissed Decatur Guy off.

I will not be voting for such a pathetic panderer. Sorry Greg Hecht. Hopefully someone, and I’m not sure who, will be running against you.

I agree in less concrete terms, with the caveat that “pathetic pandering” is what politics is all about. So, rather than saying “I won’t vote for him,” let’s just call that a strike against him. Mae, I hope there is some sort of ulterior, “keep your friends close, but your enemies closer” motive behind that letter.